Go to main content

Meet the Botanical Research Experts Behind Our Data

Historical botanical documentation often relied on fragmented colonial records or isolated field studies. This left a gap in systematic, reproducible data across Southeast Asia. We address this by integrating taxonomic precision with documented economic utility, ensuring every species profile rests on traceable evidence.

Team photo

Academic Direction

Laura Whitcomb

Laura Whitcomb

Associate Professor of Economic Botany

Laura Whitcomb connects foundational botany with the documented uses of economically important tropical plants. She writes in an accessible but evidence-led style for researchers comparing plant utility across regions.

Research Scientists & Analysts

Field evidence requires rigorous evaluation before it enters the regional flora record. This group evaluates agroforestry claims through measured observations, from rotation age to canopy structure, with attention to nomenclatural precision and agricultural relevance.

Kwame Mensah

Kwame Mensah

Forestry Research Scientist

Kwame Mensah studies forest-resource use through field cases, plot evidence, and livelihood data. His writing compares Southeast Asian agroforestry systems with broader tropical forestry experience.

Nathaniel Brooks

Nathaniel Brooks

Research Scientist, Plant Systematics

Nathaniel Brooks specializes in comparative plant systematics, herbarium evidence, and crop-wild-relative documentation. He writes taxonomic profiles with an emphasis on nomenclatural precision and agricultural relevance.

Rebecca Monroe

Rebecca Monroe

Senior Research Analyst, Agroforestry Systems

Rebecca Monroe evaluates agroforestry and forestry claims through measured observations, from rotation age to canopy structure. She brings an editorial eye to data-heavy work on Southeast Asian production systems.

Curation, Data & Ethnobotany

Translating local plant knowledge into a structured database demands careful separation of observation, inference, and documented utility. This team audits plant data for taxonomic consistency and curates regional flora content through diagnostic morphology.

Marta Kowalska

Marta Kowalska

Ethnobotanist

I write ethnobotanical case studies that connect local plant knowledge to voucher specimens, consent practices, and pharmacognosy literature. I focus on careful documentation rather than romanticized accounts of traditional use.

Matthew Kline

Matthew Kline

Biodiversity Data Scientist

Matthew Kline audits plant data for taxonomic consistency, reproducibility, and documented evidence. His work supports species profiles that depend on clean names, traceable records, and transparent uncertainty.

Peter Alden

Peter Alden

Herbarium Curator

Peter Alden curates regional flora content through diagnostic morphology, habitat evidence, and voucher-backed distribution records. His work emphasizes disciplined separation of observation, inference, and documented utility.

Our Approach to Botanical Documentation

We operate on the premise that economic botany requires traceable voucher specimens to be scientifically valid. Without a physical or digitized herbarium record, ethnobotanical claims remain anecdotal. Our methodology involves cross-referencing field livelihood data with established taxonomic databases and pharmacognosy literature.

The auditing process yields species profiles built on clean names and transparent uncertainty. We maintain taxonomic consistency across our primary database, though regional synonymy variations occasionally require manual reconciliation when interpreting older colonial literature. By keeping a disciplined separation between direct observation and inferred utility, we provide researchers with a reliable foundation for comparing plant utility across tropical environments.

Customise cookies